Solana utility claims · graded S–F
Is the utility cap?
Paste a contract address. CapCheck reads the website, docs, code and chain, tests every utility claim it finds, and hands you a grade — with receipts.
Free · No wallet · See a sample report
CAPCHECK · EVIDENCE RECEIPT
$PRCL · Parcel (sample)
- Courier app is liveVERIFIED
- Token pays courier feesVERIFIED
- Cross-chain bridgePLANNED
- "40k monthly users"UNPROVEN
- "Audited by a top firm"CAP
thank you for not aping blindly
How it works
A roadmap is easy to write. A working product leaves evidence.
Website & docs
We read what the project says about itself — landing page, docs, whitepaper — and follow the links to the actual app.
Public code
Declared GitHub repos are checked for real activity: commit history, last push, whether it's a fork or an untouched template.
On-chain data
Mint and freeze authority, holder concentration, DEX liquidity and trading activity, straight from Solana and DexScreener.
Independent sources
Coverage, integrations and audits are searched for outside the project's own channels. Self-reported numbers stay unproven.
The verdicts
Every claim gets one of four labels.
Verified
Receipts found.
We saw it working: a live app, shipped docs, real code or on-chain proof.
Planned
Honest roadmap.
Labelled as coming soon. Fine to promise — just not counted as shipped.
Unproven
No receipts.
Stated as live, but nothing we could find backs it up either way.
Cap
Evidence says otherwise.
The evidence says otherwise: dead links, template repos, phantom partners.
The grade
Five questions. One letter. Same formula every time.
- S
No cap
Live product, the token is load-bearing, usage you can check.
- A
Receipts
Strong evidence across the board with minor gaps.
- B
Mostly real
A real product; the token's role or traction is thinner.
- C
Half there
Something works, but key claims are unproven or optional.
- D
Mostly roadmap
Promises outweigh what's shipped and checkable.
- F
Cap
No working product, or the claims fall apart on inspection.
- 25%35%
Working product
Is there a product someone can actually use today?
- 25%30%
Token does something
Does the token have a specific, necessary job inside that product?
- 20%—
Real usage
Is anyone using it — users, transactions, revenue, activity?
- 15%25%
Checkable claims
Can an outsider inspect the claims — open code, docs, on-chain programs?
- 15%10%
Shipped vs. promised
How much of what's advertised is live rather than roadmap?
Each contradicted claim costs 8 points. A token the product doesn't need caps at C; nothing verifiable caps at D; no working product is an F.
House rules
Utility claims deserve scrutiny. So do we.
Projects can't pay
No paid tiers, no sponsored grades, no takedowns. The grade is the evidence.
Every source linked
Each verdict links the pages it was based on, so you can check our work.
Computed, not vibes
The AI scores five fixed questions; the letter grade is calculated from them with the same formula every time.
Fair to new launches
Tokens under 14 days old aren't marked down for having no usage history yet.
FAQ
Questions, answered.
Is this a rug checker?+
No. CapCheck asks a different question: does the thing the token claims to power actually exist, and does it need the token? We show on-chain safety facts like mint authority alongside, but the grade is about utility.
How long does a scan take?+
Usually one to three minutes. You'll watch the pages being read in real time. Reports are cached for six hours, so shared links load instantly.
Can a project game the grade?+
Its website is treated as a set of claims to test, never as instructions. Attempts to steer the review are flagged as red flags, and the letter grade comes from a fixed formula, not the model's say-so.
A grade is wrong. What now?+
Open the sources on the report and see what was read. If a project ships something new, hit rescan; the report is rebuilt from scratch.
Got a bag? Check the cap.
Run it on a project you've been researching, open the sources, and check the findings yourself.